-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
OpenTable block: use only restaurant IDs and remove searching for name #41162
Conversation
Are you an Automattician? Please test your changes on all WordPress.com environments to help mitigate accidental explosions.
Interested in more tips and information?
|
Thank you for your PR! When contributing to Jetpack, we have a few suggestions that can help us test and review your patch:
This comment will be updated as you work on your PR and make changes. If you think that some of those checks are not needed for your PR, please explain why you think so. Thanks for cooperation 🤖 Follow this PR Review Process:
If you have questions about anything, reach out in #jetpack-developers for guidance! Jetpack plugin: The Jetpack plugin has different release cadences depending on the platform:
If you have any questions about the release process, please ask in the #jetpack-releases channel on Slack. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This tests well for me. I have some remarks, but not blockers:
I wonder if we should update the title of this panel to mention "ids"?
I also noticed some alignment issues, maybe we could take that opportunity to fix that?

Maybe in a future PR we could improve the error handling when you paste an incorrect / invalid restaurant widget. Right now we display no error messages at all.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
^ Hmm, it seems to be a production behavior though 🤔 |
Code Coverage SummaryCoverage changed in 1 file.
|
These have been addressed 👍 |
Howdy @fushar thanks for lending a hand here! This is great, I'll merge this as soon as I do a rebase. |
5231f5d
to
9980260
Compare
Code Coverage SummaryCoverage changed in 1 file.
|
Fixes #39410
Proposed changes:
Other information:
Jetpack product discussion
Does this pull request change what data or activity we track or use?
No
Testing instructions: